In 1947 Mir Osman Ali Khan was ruling this state.
He was confident that with the size and resources of a state like that
of Hyderabad, he could maintain it as an independent country and unlike other
princely states could avoid joining the Republic of India. Perhaps he did not
fully comprehend the geography and demographics of his state and above all the
wind of changes blowing all over India. Indeed he succeeded for a while but
finally on 13 September, 1948, India invaded the state militarily and occupied
it within four days. Under the process of reorganization of Indian states, on
the linguistic basis, the erstwhile state of Hyderabad was divided among three
newly formed Indian states of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.
In this post I have presented the details about the demographics of the state. That surely will help in understanding the nature of this state.
No. |
Districts |
Pop. |
Hindus |
% |
Muslims |
% |
Christians |
% |
1 |
Hyderabad |
739,159 |
365,823 |
49.49 |
344,915 |
46.66 |
20,839 |
2.82 |
2 |
Atraf-i-Balada |
612,493 |
512,401 |
83.66 |
79,011 |
12.90 |
5,476 |
0.89 |
3 |
Nizamabad |
647,043 |
552,043 |
85.32 |
62,563 |
9.67 |
12,451 |
1.92 |
4 |
Medak |
758,220 |
642,047 |
84.68 |
82,590 |
10.89 |
22,852 |
3.01 |
5 |
Baghat* |
90,415 |
77,288 |
85.48 |
11,235 |
12.43 |
1,287 |
1.42 |
6 |
Mahbubnagar |
1,088,209 |
930,585 |
85.52 |
99,342 |
9.13 |
5,185 |
0.48 |
7 |
Nalgonda |
1,275,352 |
1,089,953 |
85.46 |
83,324 |
6.53 |
25,159 |
1.97 |
8 |
Warangal |
1,321,838 |
984,333 |
74.47 |
100,708 |
7.62 |
50,196 |
3.80 |
9 |
Karimnagar |
1,355,415 |
1,238,158 |
91.35 |
78,143 |
5.77 |
21,900 |
1.62 |
10 |
Adilabad |
823,622 |
633,490 |
76.92 |
54,831 |
6.66 |
9,035 |
1.10 |
11 |
Aurangabad |
1,071,950 |
844,421 |
78.77 |
172,211 |
16.07 |
16,716 |
1.56 |
12 |
Parbhani |
911,886 |
756,388 |
82.95 |
119,623 |
13.12 |
476 |
0.05 |
13 |
Nander |
803,115 |
681,830 |
84.90 |
99,472 |
12.39 |
247 |
0.03 |
14 |
Bir |
713,630 |
629,403 |
88.20 |
71,601 |
10.03 |
628 |
1.00 |
15 |
Gulbarga |
1,312,055 |
1,028,659 |
78.40 |
230,611 |
17.58 |
7,153 |
0.78 |
16 |
Raichur |
1,041,959 |
888,803 |
85.30 |
127,765 |
12.26 |
10,184 |
0.03 |
17 |
Osmanabad |
748,691 |
637,400 |
85.14 |
99,563 |
13.30 |
292 |
1.39 |
18 |
Bidar |
1,023,482 |
816,624 |
79.79 |
179,967 |
17.58 |
10,388 |
1.01 |
Total |
16,338,534 |
13,309,649 |
81.46 |
2,097,475 |
12.84 |
220,464 |
1.35 |
*Baghat was a new district and until 1931 was part of Atraf-i-Balada, when the following map was created.
NO |
City |
Pop. |
Hindus |
% |
Muslims |
% |
Christians |
% |
1 |
Hyderabad |
739,159 |
370,823 |
50.17 |
344,915 |
46.66 |
29,839 |
4.04 |
2 |
Nizamabad |
32,741 |
21,297 |
65.05 |
10,755 |
32.85 |
346 |
1.06 |
3 |
Bodhan |
19,443 |
12,324 |
63.39 |
6,580 |
33.84 |
301 |
1.55 |
4 |
Medak |
7,565 |
4,275 |
56.51 |
2,036 |
26.91 |
1,253 |
16.56 |
5 |
Siddipet |
12,865 |
10,061 |
78.20 |
2,625 |
20.40 |
77 |
0.60 |
6 |
Narayanpet |
19,396 |
10,409 |
53.67 |
5,933 |
30.59 |
14 |
0.07 |
7 |
Mahbubnagar |
16,462 |
8,921 |
54.19 |
6,861 |
41.68 |
457 |
2.78 |
8 |
Nalgonda |
12,674 |
5,708 |
45.04 |
6,269 |
49.46 |
240 |
1.89 |
9 |
Bhongir |
12,170 |
8,731 |
71.74 |
6,861 |
56.38 |
49 |
0.40 |
10 |
Warangal |
92,808 |
65,769 |
70.87 |
24,181 |
26.05 |
2,430 |
2.62 |
11 |
Khammam |
18,982 |
12,401 |
65.33 |
5,391 |
28.40 |
634 |
3.34 |
12 |
Yellandu |
15,907 |
11,615 |
73.02 |
1,942 |
12.21 |
634 |
3.99 |
13 |
Jagtial |
16,294 |
10,911 |
66.96 |
5,179 |
31.78 |
254 |
1.56 |
14 |
Karimnagar |
17,437 |
9,537 |
54.69 |
7,064 |
40.51 |
464 |
2.66 |
15 |
Peddapalli |
10,731 |
7,865 |
73.29 |
2,566 |
23.91 |
258 |
2.40 |
16 |
Nirmal |
14,499 |
10,046 |
69.29 |
4,387 |
30.26 |
32 |
0.22 |
17 |
Adilabad |
11,128 |
7,680 |
69.02 |
3,399 |
30.54 |
- |
0.00 |
18 |
Aurangabad |
50,924 |
25,281 |
49.64 |
23,416 |
45.98 |
923 |
1.81 |
19 |
Jalna |
38,096 |
23,190 |
60.87 |
14,239 |
37.38 |
1,342 |
3.52 |
20 |
Parbhani |
21,683 |
10,340 |
47.69 |
11,060 |
51.01 |
24 |
0.11 |
21 |
Hingoli |
14,601 |
9,140 |
62.60 |
5,021 |
34.39 |
20 |
0.14 |
22 |
Manwath |
14,113 |
11,287 |
79.98 |
2,545 |
18.03 |
- |
0.00 |
23 |
Basmath |
13,796 |
7,809 |
56.60 |
5,891 |
42.70 |
- |
0.00 |
24 |
Nander |
36,689 |
17,687 |
48.21 |
17,765 |
48.42 |
147 |
0.40 |
25 |
Bir |
15,222 |
9,012 |
59.20 |
5,975 |
39.25 |
43 |
0.28 |
26 |
Mominabad |
16,250 |
10,020 |
61.66 |
5,271 |
32.44 |
13 |
0.08 |
27 |
Gulbarga |
53,551 |
22,608 |
42.22 |
30,064 |
56.14 |
351 |
0.66 |
28 |
Shorapur |
11,836 |
6,729 |
56.85 |
4,974 |
42.02 |
18 |
0.15 |
29 |
Yadgir |
17,661 |
9,665 |
54.73 |
7,749 |
43.88 |
6 |
0.03 |
30 |
Kalyani |
12,542 |
5,208 |
41.52 |
7,312 |
58.30 |
- |
0.00 |
31 |
Aland |
13,041 |
4,568 |
35.03 |
7,282 |
55.84 |
6 |
0.05 |
32 |
Shahabad |
10,152 |
6,207 |
61.14 |
3,663 |
36.08 |
64 |
0.63 |
33 |
Raichur |
34,972 |
21,398 |
61.19 |
13,016 |
37.22 |
327 |
0.94 |
34 |
Kopbal |
13,970 |
7,894 |
56.51 |
5,853 |
41.90 |
26 |
0.19 |
35 |
Gadwal |
14,716 |
10,822 |
73.54 |
3,781 |
25.69 |
99 |
0.67 |
36 |
Latur |
24,985 |
15,478 |
61.95 |
8,980 |
35.94 |
16 |
0.06 |
37 |
Bidar |
20,514 |
6,620 |
32.27 |
13,002 |
63.38 |
801 |
3.90 |
38 |
Udgir |
11,238 |
6,101 |
54.29 |
4,725 |
42.04 |
41 |
0.36 |
In 1947 Mir Osman Ali Khan was ruling this state. He was confident that with the size and resources of a state like that of Hyderabad, he could maintain it as an independent country and unlike other princely states could avoid joining the Republic of India. Perhaps he did not fully comprehend the geography and demographics of his state and above all the wind of changes blowing all over India. Indeed he succeeded for a while but finally on 13 September, 1948, India invaded the state militarily and occupied it within four days. Under the process of reorganization of Indian states, on the linguistic basis, the erstwhile state of Hyderabad was divided among three newly formed Indian states of Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Karnataka.
The way things turned out, i think the best would have been to do the following:
ReplyDelete1. Kashmir should have acceded to pakistan but Maharaja should have been alowed to keep the non muslim majority Jammu and Laddakh in india
2. All the hindus from pakistan, bangladesh and kashmir should have been exchanged for equal number of muslims in india which would have reduced the muslims in india by 10 million in 1951 (there were 9.8 million hindus in pakistan and Bangladesh and 35.4 million muslims in india (including 2.3 million muslims in kashmir) . this means that after the above 2 steps the muslim population would have gone down to 23.3 million.
3. Hyderabad had a population of 17.5 million in 1951 meaning that the state was large enough to accomodate most of the muslims of rest of india however in order to not hit the marathi, telugu and kannada hindus , the state should have been split up with only Bidar, Nander, Gulbarga, Atraf - e - Baladia , Medak and Nizamabad remaining in Hyderabad state while the rest of the state going to india. This would have been large enough to accomodate the muslism of central and most of south india . in lieu of this, the Bareilly division of UP should have been given to the nizam so that the muslims of northern india esp Delhi and UP could have been accomodated there. For sure this would have split hyderabad geographically but on the other hand it would have allowed india to get a better deal in terms of area as barelly division has more or less same population as the areas i proposed to be given to india but its area is much smaller then what india was getting from hyderabad state thus giving some comfort to india.
4. In order for hyderabad to have a port, the muslim majority region of south malabar (calicut and malappapuram dist ) should have been given to hyderabad and this would have accomodated the rest of the muslims of south esp kerala region.
5. Bangladesh, pakistan and Hyderbad should have been separate countries from day one while hyderabad would have included 3 non contigious regions of Bareilly division, malabar and remaining portion of old hyderabad state.
6. rest of the small muslim ruled states like Bhopal, Junagadhm Janjira etc should have remained in india and india in return shoudl have allowed their muslim population to remain as well .
All this would have more or less taken care of population transfers. i. india and pakistan would have had good relations with each other after a mutually decided partition and population transfers
ii. Pakistna and Bangladesh woudl have been friendly as well as they would have avoided the 1971 debacle
iii. muslims of india woudl have also gotten a homleand for them in the form of hyderabad
iv. the sindhi muhajir issue in sindh would have not been there as the muslims of UP , Delhi CP etc (whih form the backbone of muhajir community) would have been living happily in hyderabad state along with their fellow co ethnists.
v. issue of divided families betwen india and pakistan and Bangladesh and the persecution of hindus in pakistan wouldnt have existed.
Assalamualaikum
DeleteWalaikum as salam
Delete