Tuesday, 15 March 2016

046. Muslim Princely States Of India

The British created the largest empire in the history of the world, with territories spread across all continents. Among these, India was the largest colony and was regarded as the "Jewel in the Crown" of the British Empire. This vast country was divided into eleven provinces, which were directly ruled and administered by the British. However, a significant portion of India was not directly governed by them. Instead, it was under the control of local rulers—known as princes—who operated under the umbrella of British paramountcy, acknowledging the British Crown as the supreme authority.


The above map shows that nearly a quarter of Indians lived in princely states, which together occupied over one-third of the landmass of the Indian subcontinent. The number of these states was approximately 565, although I have also come across a list mentioning 638 states or estates. However, the majority of these were very small in size, about 200 of them had an area of less than 25 square kilometers.

Among these princely states, around 45 were particularly significant for Muslims, either because they were ruled by Muslim rulers or had Muslim-majority populations. For the purpose of analysis, I have divided these states into three groups.

First:       States With Muslim Rulers & Muslim Majority Population
Second:   States With Muslim Rulers & Non Muslim Majority Population
Third:     States With Non Muslim Rulers & Muslim Majority Population

Out of these, 14 princely states and tribal areas joined Pakistan after independence. In addition, parts of the State of Jammu & Kashmir also acceded to Pakistan. The map below shows the location of some of these states in northern India, while the remaining states can be seen in the main map provided above.

Punjab also had several princely states, and five of them were ruled by Muslim rulers. However, only Bahawalpur joined Pakistan. The other four, Maler Kotla, Loharu, Dujana, and Pataudi, were not contiguous with Pakistan, and thus could not accede to it in 1947. Additionally, the majority population in these states was non-Muslim, which further complicated the possibility of joining Pakistan.

Kapurthala was unique in that it was the only state in eastern Punjab with a Muslim-majority population, yet it was ruled by a Sikh ruler. Geographically, it was contiguous to Muslim-majority areas such as Ferozepore, Jullundur, Gurdaspur, and Hoshiarpur. However, when these surrounding regions were unfairly awarded to India, Kapurthala too became part of India, despite its demographic alignment.


Another group of 11 Muslim princely states was located in western India, within the province of Bombay. All of these states had predominantly Hindu populations. Among them, Junagadh was the largest. At the time of independence, the Nawab of Junagadh chose to accede to Pakistan, despite the state's Hindu majority and its lack of geographical contiguity with Pakistan. However, India soon intervened militarily and annexed the state, citing the will of the people and strategic concerns.


Central India also had a cluster of eight Muslim princely states, with Bhopal being the most prominent among them. After Hyderabad and Bahawalpur, Bhopal was the third-largest princely state ruled by a Muslim dynasty. It held significant political and cultural importance and had a well-established administrative structure under its ruling family.


The following map shows two Muslim princely states of Janjira and Savanur in the Maratha heartland in western India. 


Bigger states like Hyderabad, Jammu & Kashmir and the states of Baluchistan can be seen in the main map.


I have not included the detailed history of these states or the biographies of their rulers. My primary aim has been to provide accurate maps and locations of these Muslim princely states. However, readers are welcome to contribute additional information or suggest corrections, should they have more insights or verified sources on this subject.


Tariq Amir

March 15, 2016.
Doha - Qatar .

16 comments:

  1. Dear sir. I really appreciate your efforts and research in giving accurate maps and location of princely states of British India. Great work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Sir,

      Thank you for your encouraging remarks. Regards.

      Delete
    2. Can your share Sub-Continent complete map?

      Delete
    3. https://pakgeotagging.blogspot.com/2014/12/muslim-population-of-india-according-to.html

      Delete
  2. Please also add that how hindu majority area such as amarkot,tharparkar, capital city karachi,mirpurkhas and many other in west pakistan and and some other in East Pakistan went to Pakistan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Aman,

      Please visit the following links and see by yourself that how many Hindu majority areas were given to Pakistan. In Punjab not even an inch of such an area was given to Pakistan, although seven Muslim majority tehsils, contiguous to Pakistan were given to India. For details see the link below:

      https://pakgeotagging.blogspot.com/2014/10/partition-of-punjab-in-1947.html

      Sindh was not divided and just three Hind majority teshils went to Pakistan, non of them contiguous to Indian. See the link below:

      https://pakgeotagging.blogspot.com/2020/05/127-demographics-of-sindh-province-1941.html

      For the details of East Pakistan / Bangladesh, see the link below and decide by yourself that which party suffered more:

      http://pakgeotagging.blogspot.com/2015/02/partitions-of-bengal-in-1905-and-1947.html

      Regards.

      Delete
  3. Assalamu Alaikum Tariq Bhai,

    I keep visiting your blogs for autheintic informations. Your work is unique. No one worked the way you did, particularly your detailed maps.

    Regarding this article, I would like to bring your attention that....

    Area of British Provinces = 2241505 km²
    Area of Princely States and Agencies = 1854347 km²
    Hence, total area of British India = 4095852 km²

    Source :- Census of India 1941 (Tables)

    Link :- http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/ideologie/data/CensusIndia/CensusIndia1941/Census%20of%20India%201941.pdf

    Please look at this. And also visit PAGE NO. 128 of this pdf file to get area and religion-wise population of each princely state and agency.

    --- Atif
    From India

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Atif,

      وعلیکم السلام۔. Thank you for sharing this information. I shall go through it. Where are you from India? Regards.

      Delete
  4. And I detected a typo error in the list of Muslim princely states. You wrongly typed the Area of Palanpur as 1766 km². The correct area is 4646 km².
    And you didn't mention areas of some Princely States while areas of all princely states you mentioned is available on internet in pdf form. For more detailed info, you may download census results of concerned states in Report and Tables form, in pdf.

    There is some space for improvement in this article utilizing the authentic census. Hope you will do it for us.

    Wishing you good health. Allah Nigehban

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for pointing out some mistakes. I shall check the area of Palanpur. Regarding other states I appreciate if you could share more information. Regards.

      Delete
  5. Please go through this pdf file to get the areas of Hunza, Nagar and Gilgit on Page no. 377

    https://ia801602.us.archive.org/33/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.62753/2015.62753.Census-Of-India-1941-Vol-Xxii-Jammu-Kashmir-State-Part-I.pdf

    Areas of Chitral, Dir and Swat are not given separately in British census. However, we can accurately get the area of Chitral state because the map of Chitral state is exactly same as the map of present day Chitral District of Pakistan. Areas of Dir and Swat Princely states are given on wikipedia without any citation.

    Area of Amb state is exaggerated (if we consider the map of Amb given in the Princely state map true). I couldn't find area of Amb state from credible source. On wikipedia, area of Amb state shows as 555 km² in 1901 CE which seems compatible with the Amb state map to an extent.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A very encouraging and hard work has been put into pen by you when this chapter is almost forgotten. Had there not been the case of Jammu and Kashmir alive as a conflicting issue between Pakistan and India, this chapter of history would have sunk into the dustbin of history.
    I would request to please write the names of the states ruled by Muslim nawabs on the maps also. At some this is missing, however, at last the list in pic form has cleared the sky well.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you so so very much. This is very valuable and useful information. I really was searching for such maps and you solved my problem. Jazakallah Khair.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you! In the course of looking for info I happened to bump into this page. I am not entirely familiar on how this works, but would it be possible to add me somewhere to receive updates. This is subject close to my heart.

    I am looing for information on Rahatgarh, a state near Saugor ( Sagar). I haven't been able to find anything on it. I would appreciate info/ links to sources if possible please.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hunza, Nagar, Gilgit are not british princely states. They were vassals of the Hindu Maharajahs of Kashmir.
    Marathas had done pretty decent job in ending muslim rule in subcontinent. Only major muslim ruler who escaped was the Nizam of hyderabad. His state was saved by God because of the service he did to true religion Hinduism by joining British against fanatic tyrant Tipu.

    ReplyDelete